suggest candidate methods on typename wrapper when parameterized call has no methods (#61700)

inspired by new-user confusion I've seen on discourse, example
https://discourse.julialang.org/t/scope-of-parametric-types-and-associated-error-messages/48928

```julia
julia> struct Foo{T}
           x::T
           Foo(x) = new{typeof(x)}(x)
       end

# master
julia> Foo{Int}(1)
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching Foo{Int64}(::Int64)
The type `Foo{Int64}` exists, but no method is defined for this combination of argument types when trying to construct it.
Stacktrace:
 [1] top-level scope
   @ REPL[1]:1

# PR
julia> Foo{Int}(1)
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching Foo{Int64}(::Int64)
The type `Foo{Int64}` exists, but no method is defined for this combination of argument types when trying to construct it.

Closest candidates are:
  Foo(::Any)
   @ Main REPL[1]:3

Stacktrace:
 [1] top-level scope
   @ REPL[1]:1
```

this might be a little controversial since we're technically lying to
the user (it is a method on a different type than the one they passed)
but given that it would condition it only on `isempty(methods(f))` it
seems useful to me